Wall Paintings & Frescoes
Medium
Buon fresco on lime plaster
Treatment
Injection Grouting, Surface Cleaning & Chromatic Reintegration
Damage Type
Structural Detachment & Biological Growth
The commission arrived through a private estate in Tuscany — a 16th-century villa whose principal salon retained an extensive cycle of buon fresco murals attributed to a workshop active in the Florentine tradition. Centuries of humidity fluctuation, structural movement, and neglect had left the frescoes in a state of acute vulnerability: large sections of the intonaco were detached from the arriccio beneath, the pictorial surface was obscured by biological growth and accumulated grime, and several areas had suffered irreversible loss. What followed was one of the most technically demanding and historically significant conservation interventions of my career.
The examination phase was conducted over two weeks on-site, combining visual survey, percussion testing, and instrumental analysis. Percussion mapping — carried out systematically across the entire fresco surface using a small wooden mallet — revealed the full extent of detachment: approximately 35% of the total painted area was hollow, with the intonaco separated from the arriccio by voids ranging from hairline fractures to cavities of several centimetres in depth. The most critical zones were concentrated in the upper register of the north and east walls, where rising damp and roof infiltration had repeatedly saturated the plaster support over many decades. UV fluorescence examination distinguished original buon fresco passages from later a secco retouching and 19th-century restoration campaigns. Raking light photography documented the topography of the surface in detail, revealing a complex pattern of cracks, losses, and previous repair mortars. Micro-sampling for stratigraphic analysis confirmed the presence of the original lime-based intonaco, a coarse arriccio of sand and lime, and the rough masonry substrate beneath. Biological growth — predominantly algae, lichen, and fungal colonies — was identified across approximately 20% of the surface, concentrated in areas of persistent moisture.
The consolidation of detached intonaco was identified as the most urgent priority. Left untreated, the hollow sections were at imminent risk of collapse — a loss that would have been irreversible. The treatment approach was developed in consultation with the Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio di Firenze, whose approval was required before any intervention could proceed. For areas of shallow detachment — where the void between intonaco and arriccio was less than 3mm — a low-viscosity lime-based injection grout was selected. The grout, formulated to match the porosity and elasticity of the original lime mortars, was introduced through small-diameter injection ports drilled at intervals determined by the percussion map. Each injection was carried out under controlled pressure to ensure full penetration without displacing the fragile plaster. Following injection, the ports were sealed with a lime putty mortar tinted to match the surrounding surface. For areas of deeper detachment and active cracking, a two-stage approach was employed: initial consolidation with a dilute solution of Primal AC-33 acrylic dispersion, introduced by syringe and capillary action to stabilise the paint layer and prevent further loss during subsequent operations, followed by injection grouting once the surface was secure. In the most critical zones, Japanese tissue facing was applied temporarily to support the surface during treatment and removed once the grout had cured.
With the structural consolidation complete, attention turned to the pictorial surface. Biological growth was treated with a biocide solution — a dilute solution of benzalkonium chloride — applied by brush and left under Japanese tissue for 48 hours before removal. The treatment was repeated in areas of persistent growth and monitored over subsequent weeks to confirm efficacy. Surface cleaning was carried out in stages, beginning with dry methods — soft brushes and latex sponges — to remove loose particulate matter, followed by aqueous cleaning using distilled water and, where necessary, a dilute solution of ammonium carbonate applied in poultices to address localised salt efflorescence and carbonation crusts. The cleaning process was conducted under magnification and halted at each stage to assess the emerging surface. The goal was not the removal of all accretions — the patina of age is an intrinsic part of the work's historical character — but the elimination of disfiguring deposits that obscured the original painted surface. Loss compensation was approached with restraint. Areas of complete loss — where the intonaco itself was absent — were filled with a lime mortar set slightly below the level of the surrounding surface, providing a stable ground without visually competing with the original. Chromatic reintegration of losses within the pictorial field was carried out in watercolour using the tratteggio method: fine vertical hatching in colours derived from the surrounding original, legible as restoration under close inspection but visually coherent at normal viewing distance. No attempt was made to reconstruct lost iconographic content.
Drag to Compare
The completed treatment stabilised the entire fresco cycle and returned the pictorial surface to legibility for the first time in living memory. The full extent of the 16th-century programme — a narrative cycle of considerable iconographic complexity — was revealed, prompting a reattribution of the work to a named master rather than the workshop designation previously assigned. A comprehensive preventive conservation programme was established for the villa, including environmental monitoring with dataloggers recording temperature and relative humidity at six points across the salon, a maintenance schedule for the roof and drainage systems to prevent future water infiltration, and protocols for visitor access and lighting. A full treatment archive — including all photographic documentation, analytical reports, injection maps, and material records — was deposited with the estate and a copy lodged with the Soprintendenza.
"To work on a 16th-century fresco is to enter into a conversation with the original maker — one conducted across five centuries, in the shared language of lime, pigment, and patience."
Aishwarya Ch
Technical Methods Employed
Percussion mapping, UV fluorescence, raking light photography, stratigraphic micro-sampling, lime injection grouting, Primal AC-33 consolidation, biocide treatment, ammonium carbonate poultice cleaning, tratteggio watercolour reintegration.
Begin a Conversation
Every conservation enquiry begins with a conversation. Contact our team to discuss your work in complete confidence.